Title
The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences
Language
English
Description (en)
Prey seldom rely on a single type of antipredator defence, often using multiple defences to avoid predation. In many cases, selection in different contexts may favour the evolution of multiple defences in a prey. However, a prey may use multiple defences to protect itself during a single predator encounter. Such "defence portfolios" that defend prey against a single instance of predation are distributed across and within successive stages of the predation sequence (encounter, detection, identification, approach (attack), subjugation and consumption). We contend that at present, our understanding of defence portfolio evolution is incomplete, and seen from the fragmentary perspective of specific sensory systems (e.g., visual) or specific types of defences (especially aposematism). In this review, we aim to build a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the evolution of multiple prey defences, beginning with hypotheses for the evolution of multiple defences in general, and defence portfolios in particular. We then examine idealized models of resource trade-offs and functional interactions between traits, along with evidence supporting them. We find that defence portfolios are constrained by resource allocation to other aspects of life history, as well as functional incompatibilities between different defences. We also find that selection is likely to favour combinations of defences that have synergistic effects on predator behaviour and prey survival. Next, we examine specific aspects of prey ecology, genetics and development, and predator cognition that modify the predictions of current hypotheses or introduce competing hypotheses. We outline schema for gathering data on the distribution of prey defences across species and geography, determining how multiple defences are produced, and testing the proximate mechanisms by which multiple prey defences impact predator behaviour. Adopting these approaches will strengthen our understanding of multiple defensive strategies.
Keywords (en)
Genetic Trade-Off; Warning Signals; Multisensory Integration; Predator Avoidance; Chemical Defenses; Body-Size; Color; Aposematism; Prey; Costs
DOI
10.1111/jeb.14192
Author of the digital object
David W.  Kikuchi  (Oregon State University / Bielefeld University)
Alice  Exnerová  (Charles University)
Justin  Yeager  (Universidad de las Américas)
Anne E.  Winters  (University of Exeter)
Kate  Umbers  (Western Sydney University)
Rose  Thorogood  (University of Helsinki)
Christopher H.  Taylor  (University of Nottingham)
Kyle  Summers  (East Carolina University)
Amanda M.  Stefan  (Carleton University)
Ted  Stankowich  (California State University, Long Beach)
Hannah R.  Smart  (Western Sydney University)
John  Skelhorn  (Newcastle University)
Thomas N.  Sherratt  (Carleton University)
Kaitlin A.  Schaal  (ETH Zurich)
Arlety  Roy  (University of French Guiana)
Hannah M.  Rowland  (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology)
Candy  Rowe  (Newcastle University)
Daniela C.  Rößler  (University of Konstanz / Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior)
Katja H.  Rönkä  (University of Helsinki)
Bibiana  Rojas  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna / University of Jyväskylä)
Tom  Reader  (University of Nottingham)
Jan  Raška  (Charles University)
Olivier  Penacchio  (University of St Andrews / Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Stano  Pekár  (Masaryk University)
Arka  Pal  (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research)
Erika  Páez  (Université des Antilles)
Viraj  Nawge  (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research)
Iliana  Medina  (University of Melbourne)
Callum F.  McLellan  (University of Bristol)
Melanie  McClure  (University of French Guiana)
Ugo  Lorioux-Chevalier  (University of French Guiana)
Carita  Lindstedt  (University of Helsinki)
Brian C.  Leavell  (Purdue University)
Krushnamegh  Kunte  (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research)
Mathieu  Joron  (Université de Montpellier)
Thomas J.  Hossie  (Trent University)
Marie E.  Herberstein  (Macquarie University)
Liisa  Hämäläinen  (Macquarie University)
Marianne  Elias  (Université des Antilles / Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)
Klára  Daňková  (Charles University)
Karen L.  Cheney  (University of Queensland)
Emily R.  Burdfield-Steel  (University of Amsterdam)
William L.  Allen  (Swansea University)
Kevin  Arbuckle  (Swansea University)
Thomas G.  Aubier  (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill / Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier)
Emmanuelle S.  Briolat  (University of Exeter)
Format
application/pdf
Size
2.0 MB
Licence Selected
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Type of publication
Review
Name of Publication (en)
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Pages or Volume
17
Volume
36
Number
7
From Page
975
To Page
991
Publisher
Wiley
Publication Date
2023
Content
Details
Object type
PDFDocument
Format
application/pdf
Created
23.08.2024 08:26:04
This object is in collection
Metadata
Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien (Vetmeduni) | Veterinärplatz 1 | 1210 Wien - Österreich | T +43 1 25077-0 | Web: vetmeduni.ac.at