Title (eng)
Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes
Author
Cara A. Gallagher
Author
Marco Apollonio
Author
Nancy A. Barker
Author
Author
Bruno Bassano
Author
Floris M. van Beest
Author
Anne Berger
Author
Laura R. Binder
Author
Stephen Blake
Author
Konstantin Börner
Author
Author
Author
Jane Dentinger
Author
Author
Jarred F. Duquette
Author
Jana A. Eccard
Author
Meaghan N. Evans
Author
Adam W. Ferguson
Author
Adam T. Ford
Author
Nicholas L Fowler
Author
Benedikt Gehr
Author
Wayne M. Getz
Author
Jacob R Goheen
Author
Benoit Goossens
Author
Lars Haugaard
Author
Morgan Hauptfleisch
Author
Author
Mark A. J. Hewison
Author
Lynne A. Isbell
Author
René Janssen
Author
Author
Tomasz Kamizski
Author
Todd M. Kautz
Author
Petter Kjellander
Author
Max Kröschel
Author
Peter Linderoth
Author
Christoph Lobas
Author
Peter Lokeny
Author
Mia-Lana Lührs
Author
Stephanie S. Matsushima
Author
Molly M. McDonough
Author
Dedan K. Ngatia
Author
Leopold Obermair
Author
Kirk A. Olson
Author
Kidan C. Patanant
Author
John C. Payne
Author
Tyler R. Petroelje
Author
Manuel Pina
Author
Josep Piqué
Author
Jan Pufelski
Author
Lennart Pyritz
Author
Maurizio Ramanzin
Author
Sonia Saïd
Author
Krzysztof Schmidt
Author
Carolin Scholz
Author
Author
Author
Leif Sönnichsen
Author
Erling J. Solberg
Author
Mikkel Stelvig
Author
Peter Sunde
Author
Nathan J. Svoboda
Author
Author
Wiebke Ullmann
Author
Author
Christopher C. Wilmers
Author
Filip Zieba
Author
Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica
Author
Abstract (eng)
Wildlife tagging provides critical insights into animal movement ecology, physiology, and behavior amid global ecosystem changes. However, the stress induced by capture, handling, and tagging can impact post-release locomotion and activity and, consequently, the interpretation of study results. Here, we analyze post-tagging effects on 1585 individuals of 42 terrestrial mammal species using collar-collected GPS and accelerometer data. Species-specific displacements and overall dynamic body acceleration, as a proxy for activity, were assessed over 20?days post-release to quantify disturbance intensity, recovery duration, and speed. Differences were evaluated, considering species-specific traits and the human footprint of the study region. Over 70% of the analyzed species exhibited significant behavioral changes following collaring events. Herbivores traveled farther with variable activity reactions, while omnivores and carnivores were initially less active and mobile. Recovery duration proved brief, with alterations diminishing within 4-7 tracking days for most species. Herbivores, particularly males, showed quicker displacement recovery (4 days) but slower activity recovery (7days). Individuals in high human footprint areas displayed faster recovery, indicating adaptation to human disturbance. Our findings emphasize the necessity of extending tracking periods beyond 1?week and particular caution in remote study areas or herbivore-focused research, specifically in smaller mammals.
Keywords (eng)
Animal BehaviourBehavioural EcologyConservation Biology
Type (eng)
Language
[eng]
Is in series
Title (deu)
Nature Communications
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Issued
2024
Number of pages
13
Publication
Nature Portfolio
Date issued
2024
Access rights (eng)
Rights statement (eng)
Copyright © 2024, The Author(s)