Title (en)
Automated Nuclear Morphometry: A Deep Learning Approach for Prognostication in Canine Pulmonary Carcinoma to Enhance Reproducibility
Language
English
Description (en)
The integration of deep learning-based tools into diagnostic workflows is increasingly prevalent due to their efficiency and reproducibility in various settings. We investigated the utility of automated nuclear morphometry for assessing nuclear pleomorphism (NP), a criterion of malignancy in the current grading system in canine pulmonary carcinoma (cPC), and its prognostic implications. We developed a deep learning-based algorithm for evaluating NP (variation in size, i.e., anisokaryosis and/or shape) using a segmentation model. Its performance was evaluated on 46 cPC cases with comprehensive follow-up data regarding its accuracy in nuclear segmentation and its prognostic ability. Its assessment of NP was compared to manual morphometry and established prognostic tests (pathologists' NP estimates (n = 11), mitotic count, histological grading, and TNM-stage). The standard deviation (SD) of the nuclear area, indicative of anisokaryosis, exhibited good discriminatory ability for tumor-specific survival, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 and a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.38. The algorithm achieved values comparable to manual morphometry. In contrast, the pathologists' estimates of anisokaryosis resulted in HR values ranging from 0.86 to 34.8, with slight inter-observer reproducibility (k = 0.204). Other conventional tests had no significant prognostic value in our study cohort. Fully automated morphometry promises a time-efficient and reproducible assessment of NP with a high prognostic value. Further refinement of the algorithm, particularly to address undersegmentation, and application to a larger study population are required.
Keywords (en)
Primary Lung-Tumors; Prostate-Cancer; Dogs; Classification; Survival; Stereology; Prognosis; Neoplasia; Biopsies
DOI
10.3390/vetsci11060278
Author of the digital object
Imaine Glahn  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Christof A. Bertram  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Stephan M. Winkler  (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria / Johannes Kepler University of Linz)
Marc Aubreville  (Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt)
Josef Scharinger  (Johannes Kepler University of Linz)
Jonathan Ganz  (Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt)
F. Yvonne Schulman  (Mars Petcare Science and Diagnostics)
Barbara Richter  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Sophie Merz  (IDEXX Vet Med Labor GmbH)
Robert Klopfleisch  (Freie Universität Berlin)
Andrea Klang  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Michael J. Dark  (University of Florida)
Pompei Bolfa  (Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine)
Florian Bartenschlager  (Freie Universität Berlin)
Charles-Antoine Assenmacher  (University of Pennsylvania)
Hannah Janout  (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria / Johannes Kepler University of Linz)
Philip S. Hyndman  (The Schwarzman Animal Medical Center)
Theresa Kreilmeier-Berger  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Alexander Bartel  (Freie Universität Berlin)
Brigitte Degasperi  (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)
Andreas Haghofer  (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria / Johannes Kepler University of Linz)
Taryn A. Donovan  (The Schwarzman Animal Medical Center)
Format
application/pdf
Size
5.6 MB
Licence Selected
CC BY 4.0 International
Type of publication
Article
Name of Publication (en)
Veterinary Sciences
Pages or Volume
21
Volume
11
Number
6
Publisher
MDPI
Publication Date
2024