Stabilizing selection provides a challenge to molecular population genetics. Although stabilizing selection is ubiquitous, its genomic signature is difficult to distinguish from demographic signals. Experimental evolution provides a promising approach to characterize genomic regions exposed to stabilizing selection. A recent experimental evolution study of Aedes aegypti populations evolving either with or without sexual selection found a pattern of genetic differentiation suggestive of relaxed stabilizing selection. I argue that this study could not have detected the signal of relaxed stabilizing selection. I highlight why incorrect statistical methods resulted in a high number of false positive candidate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and discuss the fallacy of functional validation of candidate SNPs for polygenic traits by RNA-mediated knockdown.

application/pdf

Genome Biology and Evolution

5

15

12

Oxford University Press