
<resource xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/ https://www.openaire.eu/schema/repo-lit/4.0/openaire.xsd">
  
<datacite:identifier identifierType="URL">https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:5078</datacite:identifier>

  
<datacite:titles>
  
<datacite:title xml:lang="en">Neophilia in wolves and dogs</datacite:title>

  
</datacite:titles>

  
<datacite:creators>
  
<datacite:creator>
  
<datacite:creatorName nameType="Personal">Rivas-Blanco, Dániel</datacite:creatorName>

  
<datacite:givenName>Dániel</datacite:givenName>

  
<datacite:familyName>Rivas-Blanco</datacite:familyName>

  
<datacite:nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="https://orcid.org/">0000-0002-3759-7192</datacite:nameIdentifier>

  
<datacite:affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna</datacite:affiliation>

  
</datacite:creator>

  
<datacite:creator>
  
<datacite:creatorName nameType="Personal">Gonnet-dit-Revel, Lou</datacite:creatorName>

  
<datacite:givenName>Lou</datacite:givenName>

  
<datacite:familyName>Gonnet-dit-Revel</datacite:familyName>

  
</datacite:creator>

  
<datacite:creator>
  
<datacite:creatorName nameType="Personal">Range, Friederike</datacite:creatorName>

  
<datacite:givenName>Friederike</datacite:givenName>

  
<datacite:familyName>Range</datacite:familyName>

  
<datacite:nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="https://orcid.org/">0000-0003-3127-5536</datacite:nameIdentifier>

  
<datacite:affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna</datacite:affiliation>

  
</datacite:creator>

  
<datacite:creator>
  
<datacite:creatorName nameType="Personal">Tebbich, Sabine</datacite:creatorName>

  
<datacite:givenName>Sabine</datacite:givenName>

  
<datacite:familyName>Tebbich</datacite:familyName>

  
</datacite:creator>

  
<datacite:creator>
  
<datacite:creatorName nameType="Personal">Marshall-Pescini, Sarah</datacite:creatorName>

  
<datacite:givenName>Sarah</datacite:givenName>

  
<datacite:familyName>Marshall-Pescini</datacite:familyName>

  
<datacite:nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="https://orcid.org/">0000-0002-5944-4701</datacite:nameIdentifier>

  
<datacite:affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna</datacite:affiliation>

  
</datacite:creator>

  
</datacite:creators>

  
<dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>

  
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="literature" uri="http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501">journal article</resourceType>

  
<datacite:rights rightsURI="http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2">open access</datacite:rights>

  
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>

  
<dc:description xml:lang="en">The study of domestication provides a unique opportunity to analyze the effects of natural selection in the attraction towards novelty, because selective pressures on domesticated animals are often greatly diminished or different from their wild counterparts. In this study, we investigated the neophilic levels of three groups of canids differing in their level of contact with human environments both from an evolutionary and ontogenetic perspective: wolves, pack-living dogs, and pet dogs. In order to study their neophilic response, we presented the animals with two objects. The first of these objects was displayed in the animals’ enclosure for several days. After the animals were habituated to this first object, the second one was introduced together with the first one in a shorter test session meant to explore their preferences for either of the objects. We predicted that dogs —and pet dogs in particular— to display higher levels of neophilia, because human-created environments tend to change at a faster pace, and thus, a higher drive to explore these changes would be more beneficial than in a comparably more stable environment. Our results show no apparent differences between the groups in terms of latency to approach the new object, nor in the identity of the object they approached first. Nonetheless, all groups interacted more with the new object during the test phase. Wolves also interacted longer with the object presented in the first phase of the experiment.</dc:description>

  
<datacite:subjects>
  
<datacite:subject xml:lang="en">Wolves</datacite:subject>

  
<datacite:subject xml:lang="en">Dogs</datacite:subject>

  
<datacite:subject xml:lang="en">Neophilia</datacite:subject>

  
<datacite:subject xml:lang="en">Exploration</datacite:subject>

  
<datacite:subject xml:lang="en">Motivation</datacite:subject>

  
</datacite:subjects>

  
<licenseCondition uri="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licenseCondition>

  
<file accessRightsURI="http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2" mimeType="application/pdf" objectType="fulltext">https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/api/object/o:5078/download</file>

  
<datacite:alternateIdentifiers>
  
<datacite:alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="DOI">10.1007/s10071-025-02019-z</datacite:alternateIdentifier>

  
</datacite:alternateIdentifiers>

  
<datacite:relatedIdentifiers>
  
<datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:605</datacite:relatedIdentifier>

  
</datacite:relatedIdentifiers>

  
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>

  
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Animal Cognition</dc:source>

  
<dc:source>issn:1435-9456</dc:source>

  
<version uri="http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85">VoR</version>

  
<citationTitle>Animal Cognition</citationTitle>

  
<citationVolume>28</citationVolume>

  
<citationIssue>1</citationIssue>

  
<datacite:sizes>
  
<datacite:size>1.31 MB</datacite:size>

  
</datacite:sizes>

  
<datacite:dates>
  
<datacite:date dateType="Issued">2025</datacite:date>

  
</datacite:dates>

  
</resource>


