<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:type xml:lang="deu">Text</dc:type>
  <dc:type xml:lang="deu">Wissenschaftlicher Artikel</dc:type>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/ani14182634</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Selecting a dog that is incompatible with the owner&#39;s expectations can negatively impact both parties. Previous studies on dog acquisition have primarily focused on shelter environments, using closed-ended questions to assess hypothetical preferences. In contrast, our study employed open-ended questions with a convenience sample of Austrian dog owners (N = 1077) to retrospectively explore why the owners chose their dogs. We also examined consistency in owners&#39; responses and the influence of owner characteristics (age, education, household composition, previous dog experience, purpose of acquisition) on their reasons. Content analysis revealed 24 codes; the frequency of codes was 2.4/response. The most frequent codes were breed-based choice (29%), choosing on a whim, without careful consideration (24%), work/sport skills (22%), and rescuing a dog (17%). The least frequent were the age (1%), health (1%), sex (1%), and guarding skills (0.6%) of the dog. Twelve codes were consistent over time, and ten were consistent across dogs, indicating that the owners showed a consistent preference for certain traits. Except for the owner&#39;s education level, all characteristics affected the likelihood of mentioning at least one code. Most associations were found with the presence of children in the household: owners with children preferred friendly, easily manageable, and easy-to-train dogs and were less likely to adopt or rescue compared to owners living without children. Our findings also highlight discrepancies between spontaneous (free-text) reports and responses to closed-ended questions, underscoring the importance of qualitative data in better understanding the motivations behind and the factors influencing dog acquisition.</dc:description>
  <dc:rights xml:lang="eng">© 2024 by the authors</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights xml:lang="eng">open access</dc:rights>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Why Do People Choose a Particular Dog? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Factors Owners Consider Important When Acquiring a Dog, on a Convenience Sample of Austrian Pet Dog Owners</dc:title>
  <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
  <dc:source xml:lang="eng">Animals</dc:source>
  <dc:creator>Kata Mária Udvarhelyi-Tóth</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ivaylo B. Iotchev</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Eniko Kubinyi</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Borbála Turcsán</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">Text</dc:type>
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">journal article</dc:type>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Animal Shelters</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Behavior</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Benefits</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Welfare</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Friends</dc:subject>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:3705</dc:identifier>
</oai_dc:dc>