<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  
    
  <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
    
  
    
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
    
  
    
  <dc:relation>isPartOf:https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:605</dc:relation>
    
  
    
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    
  
    
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Beam Computed-Tomography; Landmark Identification; Equine Incisor; Reliability; Malocclusion; Disorders; Accuracy; Teeth</dc:subject>
    
  
    
  <dc:source>Veterinary Sciences 9(9) (2022)</dc:source>
    
  
    
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    
  
    
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">article</dc:type>
    
  
    
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Intra- and Interexaminer Measurement Variability Analysis of an Orthodontic Gauge Device to Determine Incisor Occlusal Surface Angles in the Horse</dc:title>
    
  
    
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Incisor malocclusions are common in horses. As yet, an evidence-based understanding of incisor occlusal surface angle dynamics and normocclusal range is missing. Orthodontic measuring devices could help unravel this information objectively but imply measurement validation. We evaluated intra- and interexaminer variability of repeated sagittal and transversal incisor occlusal surface angle measures using a commercial orthodontic gauge device (MaPHorse1). Five examiners (two experienced, three inexperienced) measured six cadaver heads on 2 consecutive days in a blinded block-randomization design, resulting in 16 measures per examiner*head. Sagittal and transversal angle measures revealed low intraexaminer variability at scale-level independent mean SDs of α 0.58° and α 0.69°, respectively. Sagittal angle measures associate with low interexaminer variability, showing small mean angle differences (max. α 0.51° ± 0.35°), small scatter, and more consistent data reproducibility. Despite comparable mean interexaminer differences, the spread of transversal angle measures was relevantly higher using the proposed landmarks (average 2.2-fold higher interquartile range). The measurement performance of experienced and inexperienced examiners did not systematically differ. The time required for individual measurements was already comparable after 24/96 repetitions. This instrument may help deciphering sagittal angle normocclusal range and orthognathic dynamics and, with a proposed procedural amendment, transversal angle as well.</dc:description>
    
  
    
  <dc:creator>Kau, Silvio (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</dc:creator>
    
  <dc:creator>Hartl, Bettina (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</dc:creator>
    
  <dc:creator>Pellachin, Matteo (Private Equine Veterinary Dentist and Specialist on Equine Orthodontics Padova)</dc:creator>
    
  <dc:creator>Kunz, João R. (Veterinary Clinic Gessertshausen Altano GmbH)</dc:creator>
    
  <dc:creator>Moser, Viktoria J. (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</dc:creator>
    
  <dc:creator>Motter, Katharina S. (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</dc:creator>
    
  
    
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/vetsci9090481</dc:identifier>
    
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:2091</dc:identifier>
    
  
    
  <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
    
  
</oai_dc:dc>
