<resource xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4">
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Kau, Silvio (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</creatorName>
<givenName>Silvio</givenName>
<familyName>Kau</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Hartl, Bettina (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</creatorName>
<givenName>Bettina</givenName>
<familyName>Hartl</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Pellachin, Matteo (Private Equine Veterinary Dentist and Specialist on Equine Orthodontics Padova)</creatorName>
<givenName>Matteo</givenName>
<familyName>Pellachin</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Kunz, João R. (Veterinary Clinic Gessertshausen Altano GmbH)</creatorName>
<givenName>João R.</givenName>
<familyName>Kunz</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Moser, Viktoria J. (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</creatorName>
<givenName>Viktoria J.</givenName>
<familyName>Moser</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Motter, Katharina S. (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)</creatorName>
<givenName>Katharina S.</givenName>
<familyName>Motter</familyName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Intra- and Interexaminer Measurement Variability Analysis of an Orthodontic Gauge Device to Determine Incisor Occlusal Surface Angles in the Horse</title>
</titles>
<publisher>MDPI</publisher>
<publicationYear>2022</publicationYear>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Other">Incisor malocclusions are common in horses. As yet, an evidence-based understanding of incisor occlusal surface angle dynamics and normocclusal range is missing. Orthodontic measuring devices could help unravel this information objectively but imply measurement validation. We evaluated intra- and interexaminer variability of repeated sagittal and transversal incisor occlusal surface angle measures using a commercial orthodontic gauge device (MaPHorse1). Five examiners (two experienced, three inexperienced) measured six cadaver heads on 2 consecutive days in a blinded block-randomization design, resulting in 16 measures per examiner*head. Sagittal and transversal angle measures revealed low intraexaminer variability at scale-level independent mean SDs of α 0.58° and α 0.69°, respectively. Sagittal angle measures associate with low interexaminer variability, showing small mean angle differences (max. α 0.51° ± 0.35°), small scatter, and more consistent data reproducibility. Despite comparable mean interexaminer differences, the spread of transversal angle measures was relevantly higher using the proposed landmarks (average 2.2-fold higher interquartile range). The measurement performance of experienced and inexperienced examiners did not systematically differ. The time required for individual measurements was already comparable after 24/96 repetitions. This instrument may help deciphering sagittal angle normocclusal range and orthognathic dynamics and, with a proposed procedural amendment, transversal angle as well.</description>
</descriptions>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">PDFDocument</resourceType>
<language>en</language>
<dates>
<date dateType="Created">2023-09-08T12:17:15.951Z</date>
</dates>
<subjects>
<subject>Beam Computed-Tomography; Landmark Identification; Equine Incisor; Reliability; Malocclusion; Disorders; Accuracy; Teeth</subject>
</subjects>
<sizes>
<size>879153 b</size>
</sizes>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY 4.0 International</rights>
</rightsList>
</resource>
